Eu Turkey Readmission Agreement 2013

2. Subject to paragraph 3 of this Article, any transfer of a person to be reviewed under any of the obligations laid down in Articles 3 to 6 shall require the submission of an application for readmission to the competent authority of the requested State. 5. Without prejudice to Article 11(2), a written reply to the request for readmission shall be provided. 4. After the Member State has responded positively to the readmission application or, where appropriate, after the expiry of the time limits referred to in Article 11(2), the authorities of the Member State shall, if necessary, issue to the person whose readmission has been accepted the travel document necessary for his return, valid for at least three months, within three working days. Where there is no diplomatic mission or consular post of the Member State in Turkey, or where the Member State has not issued the travel document within three working days, it shall be deemed to accept the use of the standard EU travel document for removal purposes (3). The EU-Turkey deal also served to revive agreements between Morocco and Spain, which had worked together on migration issues in the past. Madrid persuaded the European Union to allocate €140 million to measures such as speedboats and staff to enforce Moroccan migration controls, and provided an additional €30 million. As a result, less than half of the people came to Spain by sea in 2019 than the previous year. 3. After consent has been given or, where applicable, after the expiry of the periods referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, the data subject shall be transferred within three months.

At the request of the requesting State, this period may be extended by the time necessary to remove legal or practical obstacles. the arrangements for readmission under the accelerated procedure; 2. The implementing Protocols referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall enter into force only after notification to the Readmission Committee referred to in Article 19. 1. As far as possible, the readmission request should contain the following information: Turkey`s justification for the agreement was based, at least in part, on the expectation shared by much of the international community that the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad did not last long. At the beginning of the Syrian civil war, Turkey declared an open-door policy and offered temporary protection to Syrians fleeing the fighting. However, the persistence of the Syrian conflict and the growing number of refugees have posed challenges, and since 2016 Turkey has tightened its eastern borders. While Assad has consolidated his position, it has become clear that most of the refugees will not return to Syria soon, casting doubt on the temporary nature of their stay.

As of March 2021, nearly 3.7 million Syrian refugees were living in Turkey, an increase of nearly 1 million since the signing of the 2016 agreement. The agreement also offered Turkey measures commensurate with its long-awaited ambitions for closer relations with Europe, including the rise of the EU. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan may also have been motivated by domestic political pressure; a few months later, his government repelled a coup attempt. Without prejudice to Article 23 and without prejudice to the right of the competent authorities to recover the costs of readmission from the person to be readmitted, including the persons referred to in Article 3(2) and (5)(2), or from third parties, all transport costs incurred in the context of readmission and transit operations under this Agreement to the border crossing point of the State requested for applications under Sections I and II of the Agreement; or up to the border of the State of final destination for the applications referred to in section IV of the Convention shall be borne by the requesting State. 1. This Agreement is without prejudice to the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the Union, its Member States and Turkey under international law, including international conventions to which they are parties, in particular: for the future, the creation of a new framework for the regulation of migration will be a crucial challenge of the 21st century. Whether intentionally or unintentionally, the European Union`s 2016 agreement with Turkey provided a model for these agreements of the future. By rallying the bloc`s support for a single pact and relying on neighboring countries as barriers, the agreement marked a turning point, and variations in its central premise are likely to be revealed and discussed in the coming years. The costs have been high, both in terms of political capital spent and mistreatment of migrants trapped along the way. But the key parameters are defined, and it is unlikely that they will be reversed as soon as possible as soon as they have been built. 1.

Turkey, at the request of a Member State and without any other formalities to be completed by that Member State other than those provided for in this Agreement, shall take back all persons who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry into that Member State under the law of that Member State or Union law, who are present or present in the territory of the requesting Member State, provided that it is demonstrated, in accordance with Article 9, that they are nationals of Turkey. As the 2020 impasse signaled, the European Union and Turkey remain in an uncomfortable partnership, separated by both politics and geography. While the arrangement has shown signs of fraying, with particular frustration on Turkey`s part, its fundamental promise has been kept – at least for Europe. The number of migrants and asylum seekers arriving decreased in part as a result of the agreement, and the bloc remained intact. With the last of the €6 billion in aid promised in December, interest in renewing the deal has risen again. And despite its challenges, the EU-Turkey statement has become a model for Europe`s strategy to outsource migration management to its neighbours. This article examines the achievements and challenges of the 2016 agreement and its associated costs. 2. The readmission obligation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply if: on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the EU-Turkey Agreement, the Heads of State or Government in Europe and Turkey have indicated that the Agreement is likely to last in one form or another. In late March, Erdoğan`s chief adviser, Ibrahim Kalin, argued that amending and renewing the agreement “could give the Syrian people a sense of hope and confidence.” Von der Leyen and European Council President Charles Michel met Erdoğan in Ankara on April 6 and then signaled that additional funds would be available for Turkey as long as the country continued to abide by its end of the deal.

“I am very determined to ensure the continuity of EU funding in this area,” von der Leyen said. “Our support is a sign of Europe`s solidarity with Turkey and an investment in common stability.” at the time of submission of the readmission application, hold a valid Turkish visa issued by Turkey and enter the territory of a Member State directly from the territory of Turkey; or relationship with bilateral readmission agreements or arrangements of the Member States The response to a request for readmission may be made by any means of communication, including electronic, by electronic fax. B, by e-mail, e-mail, etc. In order to support the further full and effective implementation of this Agreement, EU financial assistance, including a programme to support the sector in the field of integrated border management and migration, will be developed in accordance with the modalities to be determined jointly with the Turkish authorities and beyond 2013 within the framework of and in accordance with the next EU Financial Perspective. Common list of documents considered as evidence of the conditions for the readmission of third-country nationals and stateless persons 3. Where none of the documents listed in Annexes 1 or 2 can be produced, the competent diplomatic and consular missions of the requested State concerned shall, in response to a request contained in the request for readmission of the requesting State, make the necessary arrangements to question the person who resumes without delay and within seven working days from the date of the request; to establish his nationality. . .

. .